Sea to Summit Ether Light XR Insulated vs Exped Ultra 6.5R

In short: The Sea to Summit Ether Light XR Insulated costs $1 less; the Exped Ultra 6.5R is warmer by 2.8 points of R-value; the Exped Ultra 6.5R saves 1.1 oz; the Sea to Summit Ether Light XR Insulated is 4 inches thick against 3.5.

SpecSea to Summit Ether Light XR InsulatedExped Ultra 6.5R
Approx. price~$199~$200
R-valueR 4.1R 6.9
Season bandCold three-seasonWinter
R-value standardASTM F3340ASTM F3340
Weight1 lb 0.6 oz15.5 oz
R per ounce0.25 R/oz0.45 R/oz
Thickness4 in3.5 in
Pad typeairair
Inflationpump sackpump sack
Dimensions72 × 22 in72 × 20.5 in
Packed size8 × 4 in9.1 × 4.3 in
InsulationThermalCore multi-layer polyethylene film inside Air Sprung CellsTexpedloft synthetic batting welded to the top and bottom of the air chambers
Top fabric30D20D

Shaded cells mark the row where one has a measurable advantage. Weight, thickness, girth and shape are left unshaded on purpose: heavier is sometimes tougher, wider is sometimes warmer, and calling a winner on those would be an opinion dressed as a measurement.

What each one does well, and costs you

Sea to Summit Ether Light XR Insulated

  • Four inches of loft at 16.6 ounces — the best thickness-to-weight in this catalogue outside the Tensor Elite.
  • The Air Sprung Cell grid stops the wobble that ruins most thick air pads for side sleepers.
  • Five sizes across mummy and rectangular cuts, so the fit choice is real rather than nominal.
  • The Airstream pump is integrated into the stuff sack, so there is no extra item to lose.
  • Sea to Summit publishes the ASTM figure and explains the test on the product page, which is unusually straight.
  • R-value 4.1 is lower than several lighter pads here — the XLite is 4.5 at 13 ounces.
  • Four inches is a long way to fall if it deflates, and a tall pad in a low tent is a tight fit.
  • $199 for the Regular puts it in the same bracket as warmer pads.
  • The many-celled construction makes it slower to deflate and pack than a simple baffled pad.

Exped Ultra 6.5R

  • 0.45 R per ounce is the best warmth-per-weight figure in this catalogue — better than the XTherm's 0.47 only in the sense that it does it for less money and more loft.
  • Actually lighter than Exped's own 3R at more than twice the R-value, which is the single strangest line on this site.
  • 3.5 inches of loft and silent batting insulation.
  • Same $200 in M, MW and LW, so the wide version is free.
  • Winter-capable without being a winter-only pad.
  • The name says 6.5R and the tested figure is 6.9, which is confusing in the other direction from most marketing.
  • 20-denier fabric on a pad that will spend nights on frozen ground and scree.
  • $200, and the 3R below it is only $30 cheaper for half the warmth — the cheaper pad is the worse buy.
  • Batting insulation adds packed bulk compared with film at the same R-value.