Exped Ultra 3R vs Exped Ultra 6.5R

Exped Ultra 3R

Exped

Exped Ultra 3R

~$170

vs

In short: The Exped Ultra 3R costs $30 less; the Exped Ultra 6.5R is warmer by 3.7 points of R-value; the Exped Ultra 6.5R saves 0.5 oz; the Exped Ultra 6.5R is 3.5 inches thick against 3.

SpecExped Ultra 3RExped Ultra 6.5R
Approx. price~$170~$200
R-valueR 3.2R 6.9
Season bandThree-seasonWinter
R-value standardASTM F3340ASTM F3340
Weight1 lb15.5 oz
R per ounce0.20 R/oz0.45 R/oz
Thickness3 in3.5 in
Pad typeairair
Inflationpump sackpump sack
Dimensions72 × 20.5 in72 × 20.5 in
Packed size9.1 × 4.3 in9.1 × 4.3 in
InsulationTexpedloft synthetic batting welded to the top and bottom of the air chambersTexpedloft synthetic batting welded to the top and bottom of the air chambers
Top fabric20D20D

Shaded cells mark the row where one has a measurable advantage. Weight, thickness, girth and shape are left unshaded on purpose: heavier is sometimes tougher, wider is sometimes warmer, and calling a winner on those would be an opinion dressed as a measurement.

What each one does well, and costs you

Exped Ultra 3R

  • Synthetic batting instead of reflective film: silent, and it feels warm immediately rather than after the air heats up.
  • Every size is the same price, so the wide version is free — almost nobody else does this.
  • The Schnozzel pump bag inflates the pad in two passes and works as a dry bag the rest of the time.
  • Three inches of loft at 16 ounces with 20-denier recycled face fabric.
  • R-value 3.2 is the lowest of the insulated pads here except the summer specialists.
  • 16 ounces is three more than an XLite for a lower R-value — the batting costs weight.
  • $170 is mid-pack, and the warmer 6.5R is only $30 more.
  • Exped's size codes (M, MW, LW) take a chart to decode.

Exped Ultra 6.5R

  • 0.45 R per ounce is the best warmth-per-weight figure in this catalogue — better than the XTherm's 0.47 only in the sense that it does it for less money and more loft.
  • Actually lighter than Exped's own 3R at more than twice the R-value, which is the single strangest line on this site.
  • 3.5 inches of loft and silent batting insulation.
  • Same $200 in M, MW and LW, so the wide version is free.
  • Winter-capable without being a winter-only pad.
  • The name says 6.5R and the tested figure is 6.9, which is confusing in the other direction from most marketing.
  • 20-denier fabric on a pad that will spend nights on frozen ground and scree.
  • $200, and the 3R below it is only $30 cheaper for half the warmth — the cheaper pad is the worse buy.
  • Batting insulation adds packed bulk compared with film at the same R-value.